asp.net-core-mvc

My old code looks like this: public static class DbHelper { // One conection per request public static Database CurrentDb() { if (HttpContext.Current.Items["CurrentDb"] == null) { var retval = new DatabaseWithMVCMiniProfiler("MainConnectionString"); HttpContext.Current.Items["CurrentDb"] = retval; return retval; } return (Database)HttpContext.Current.Items["CurrentDb"]; } } Since we don't have HttpContext anymore easily accesible in core, how can I achieve the same thing? I need to access CurrentDb() easily from everywhere Would like to use something like MemoryCache, but with Request lifetime

I have a generic controller, which have several derived controller classes. but I cannot figure out how to handle the HttpGet's route name since it require constant. [HttpGet("{id}", Name ="should not hard coded here for derived class")] public virtual async Task<IActionResult> Get(int id) I need the route name because in my HttpPost function I want to return CreatedAtRoute() which require HttpGet's route name The route name cannot be hard coded because all the derived class need to have a different route name. here is the base controller public abstract class BaseController<TEntity, TContext>

I am using MVC6 and have a checkbox input field in my form, but when the form is submitted the value for the checkbox always gets passed to the ViewModel as false: Here is how the property is declared in my ViewModel: [Display(Name = "Include Sales Tax")] public bool IncludeSalesTax { get; set; } Here is how the form looks in my MVC6 razor form: <div class="form-group"> <div class="checkbox"> <label><input asp-for="IncludeSalesTax" type="checkbox" value="">@Html.DisplayNameFor(m => m.IncludeSalesTax)</label> </div> </div> I figured the above would be the best way to follow Twitter Bootstrap

I'm new to MVC and decided to start with .net-core, so I don't have much understanding of the differences in core vs. older versions. I did find the below question which offers some insight but hasn't helped me to decide whether I can basically ignore partial views. Why should we use MVC 6 Feature View Components over Partial View: What is the difference? My question is simply - if I can do something with a ViewComponent, is there any good reason not to? Many Thanks! Example provided below for context. Main view calls: ViewComponent: <div class="modal-body" ID="modalPersonInner"> @await

Has anyone has any good experience with opening a websocket connection inside MVC controller? Technology stack: ASPNET Core 1.0 (RC1) MVC, dnx46, System.Net.WebSockets Why MVC instead of middleware: for overall consistency, routing, already injected repositories, an option to call private methods in the same controller. [HttpGet("v1/resources/{id}")] public async Task<IActionResult> GetAsync(string id) { var resource = await this.repository.GetAsync(id); if (resource == null) { return new HttpStatusCodeResult(404); } if (this.HttpContext.WebSockets.IsWebSocketRequest) { var webSocket = await

I have cors setup correctly in an ASP.NET Core web app. Im using the following package... "Microsoft.AspNet.Cors": "6.0.0-rc1-final" and here is the startup.cs snippet... public virtual IServiceProvider ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services) { services.AddCors ( options => { options.AddPolicy ( CORSDefaults.PolicyName, builder => { //From config... var allowedDomains = new []{"http://aaa.somewhere.com","https://aaa.somewhere.com","http://bbb.somewhere.com","https://bbb.somewhere.com"}; //Load it builder .WithOrigins(allowedDomains) .AllowAnyHeader() .AllowAnyMethod() .AllowCredentials(

I am doing this project in mvc6 using asp.net framework 6.how I can add this reference in my project please help me. You have to talk to BingAds and ask them for a compatible version. This is the same with every library provider, they all must support the new platform. You cannot add a library which targets .NET 4.x, they must rewrite and publish a new version/ 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36194075/reference-is-not-added-in-asp-net-mvc-6-for-microsoft-bingads-sdk

What is an IActionResult ? I tried looking at MSDN and other sites, but need general, common easy to understand answer. MSDN IActionResult Example: public IActionResult About() { ViewData["Message"] = "About Page"; return View(); } In general terms IActionResult type is a base abstraction of an action result. It is used as the base of other derived action results that represent specific response types, of which there are many. Reference Asp.Net Core Action Results Explained IActionResult and ActionResult IActionResult and ActionResult work as a container for other action results, in that

I have a situation where a site may need a link to redirect to certain controllers based on database results. For example: site.com/abcd needs to return the result from a Item Controller, which would normally be called as /item/view/123 The key here is that I can't hard code the abcd into the routing. And some links may go to an Item Controller, others may go to an Orders controller. I've tried a catchall route to a controller than then loads up the desired controller, but the environment is not set so it does not work properly (it can't find the views). NightOwl888 You can get whatever