asp.net-core-2.0

问题 I wanted to ask you guys if is it possible, to make some routing like this for my project /{action}/{title} ? I was wondering if that is possible, does this url has to be a primary key too? Since there is no ID passed to know which blog post is this. Thank you. 回答1: You can do this quite easily with attribute routing: [Route("blogs")] public class BlogController { [AcceptVerbs("GET", "HEAD", Route = "{slug}")] public IActionResult View(string slug) { } } This maps all requests to /blogs

问题 Trying to use this code on ASP.NET Core 2.0 ApplicationUser MyUser = await _userManager.FindByNameAsync(model.Email); var Code = await _userManager.GenerateChangePhoneNumberTokenAsync(MyUser, model.MobileNumber); Results for variable "Code" is this instead of 6 digits. CfDJ8Kjv6NuVfg5GkZ9ZEJRMBG2BxkZ4fnbwTfkq5335ft3Lm0sCl7uaRXFce+uDMtXC8wgdoiocyXV4nGlBz25tkbZr4JvZ6/1gk6EenJKmkq2of3XXfK/xMWE/M2aqmkz9OJpOe75Wz+xlmgq

问题 I would say that classic ASP.NET Core 2.0 application with authentication consists of adding desired authentication service in ConfigureServices method in the Startup.cs file: services.AddAuthentication().AddFacebook(facebookOptions => { facebookOptions.AppId = Configuration["Authentication:Facebook:AppId"]; facebookOptions.AppSecret = Configuration["Authentication:Facebook:AppSecret"]; }); This is fine as long as the authentication configuration is known during the time when

问题 I need to support two authentication types in ASP.NET Core 2.0 MVC application: AddIdentityServerAuthentication AddOpenIdConnect It was very easy in ASP.NET Core 1.0 version. But in version 2.0 version syntax changed. This is my code: services.AddAuthentication(o => { o.DefaultSignInScheme = CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme; o.DefaultChallengeScheme = OpenIdConnectDefaults.AuthenticationScheme; o.DefaultAuthenticateScheme = OpenIdConnectDefaults.AuthenticationScheme; })

问题 I'm trying to test an ASP. NET Core 2 dockerized application in VSTS. It is set up inside the docker container via docker-compose. The tests make requests via addresses stored in config (or taken from environment variables, if set). Right now, the build is set up like this: Run compose command to restore and publish the app. Run compose to create and run docker containers. Run a bash script (explained below). Run tests. First of all, I found out that I can't use http://localhost:port inside

问题 Hello I have Angular 6 project with ASP.NET Core 2.0. backend. Working in Visual Studio. No server side rendering, just SPA. When i run my project (F5), ng serve command automatically called by .Net, code below. Produces new command line window, but it seems like the styles (line rewriting, text progress bars,...) not working. app.UseSpa(spa => { spa.Options.SourcePath = "ClientApp"; if (env.IsDevelopment()) { spa.UseAngularCliServer(npmScript: "start"); } }); Text stops rendering, but

问题 I have a existing REST API developed using ASP.NET WEB API 2 where the authorization is handled by storing all the controller name and action method details in a xml file. WebAPIAuthorization.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <WebApiAuthorizationSettings xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <WebApiControllerAuthorizationSettings> <WebApiControllerAuthorizationSetting> <ControlerName>Profile</ControlerName>

问题 I have tried most of the examples in the Google Results, Stackoverflow and in AutoMapper. But was not able to get the IValueResolverdependancy injection to work. I have below service public class StorageService : IStorageService { private readonly BlobServiceSettings _blobServiceSettings; public StorageService(IOptions<BlobServiceSettings> blobServiceSettings) { _blobServiceSettings = blobServiceSettings.Value; } // some methods I need } This is my profile public class MappingProfile :

问题 I'm writing a Rest API Framework, I'd like to create a db authorization context. The context takes in a role resolver and uses that to filter the default set. Base on a set of rules. In my First Attempt I thought maybe I could apply default filters to the entity sets to prohibit access to certain resources public class AuthorizationContext : DbContext { protected IConstraintResolver _constraintResolver; public AuthorizationContext(IConstraintResolver constraintResolver) { this.

问题 I have a repository that uses application insights to log information about our services running in asp.net. We have some ASP.NET Core 2.0 sites along with some full framework asp.net 4 applications. With the release of application insights 2.5, we get support for live streaming in core sites so I upgraded all packages in the solution to use latest 2.5. Then I built the branch and deployed it via VSTS build and release and I noticed my live streaming was working great. Then, I released the