anonymous-function

1. function abc(){ alert("named function"); } v/s 2. function(){ alert("Un-Named function"); } Kindly explain from beginners point. They work exactly the same. It's only in how you are able to run them that they are different. So example #1 you could call again at any point with abc(); . For example 2, you would either have to pass it as a parameter to another function, or set a variable to store it, like this: var someFunction = function() { alert("Un-Named function"); } Here's how to pass it into another function and run it. // define it function iRunOtherFunctions(otherFunction) {

Is there a way to write an anonymous function that is recursive in Scala? I'm thinking of something like this: ((t: Tree) => { print(t.value); for (c <- t.children) thisMethod(c) })(root) (Related question: Which languages support *recursive* function literals / anonymous functions? ) Rustem Suniev As described in the link you posted. You can use Y-combinator. Here is example: scala> def fix[A,B](f: (A=>B)=>(A=>B)): A=>B = f(fix(f))(_) fix: [A,B](f: ((A) => B) => (A) => B)(A) => B scala> val fact = fix[Int,Int](f => a => if(a<=0) 1 else f(a-1) * a) fact: (Int) => Int = <function1> scala> fact

Is it even possible? chris if you mean an anonymous function, and are using a version of Java before Java 8, then in a word, no. ( Read about lambda expressions if you use Java 8+ ) However, you can implement an interface with a function like so : Comparator<String> c = new Comparator<String>() { int compare(String s, String s2) { ... } }; and you can use this with inner classes to get an almost-anonymous function :) polygenelubricants Here's an example of an anonymous inner class. System.out.println(new Object() { @Override public String toString() { return "Hello world!"; } }); // prints

I'm trying to mock this method Task<TResult> GetResultAsync<TResult>(Func<string, TResult> transformFunc) like this iMock.Setup(m => m.GetResultAsync(It.IsAny<Func<string, object>>())).ReturnsAsync(new { isPair = false }); The method to test doing the call passing an anonymous type to the generic parameter like this instance.GetResultAsync(u => new {isPair = u == "something" }) //dont look at the function return because as generic could have diferent implementations in many case Moq never matches my GetResultAsync method with the parameters sent. I'm using Moq 4 The anonymous type is going to

I have a function handle that operates on 2d arrays of arbitrary size: R2T = @(DL1,DL2) arrayfun(@(DL1,DL2)... 1/(fzero(@(x)fFitObj1(x)./fFitObj2(x)-... DL1./DL2,[minLim maxLim])) ... ,DL1,DL2) - C1; Here's a bottom-up breakdown of what it does: fzero(@(x)fFitObj1(x)./fFitObj2(x)-DL1./DL2,[minLim maxLim]) - This bit looks for a zero of the considered function on the interval [minLim maxLim] , where fFitObj1 and fFitObj2 are function handles available from before, C1 is some known constant and DL1, DL2 are provided. @(DL1,DL2)1/(fzero(...)) - a wrapper for fzero that allows DL1 and DL2 to be

I have some PHP 5.3 code which builds an array to be passed to a view. This is the code I have. # Select all this users links. $data = $this->link_model->select_user_id($this->user->id); if (count($data) > 0) { # Process the data into the table format. $table = array ( 'properties' => array ( 'delete_link_column' => 0, ), 'callbacks' => array ( # Callback for the name link. function($value) { return sprintf('<a href="/links/view/name/%s">%s</a>', $value, $value); }, # Callback for the category link. function($value) { return sprintf('<a href="/category/view/name/%s">%s</a>', $value, $value); }