anonymous-function

JavaScript: When assigning an anonymous function to a variable, function return value is not passed, rather the function as a string

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-07 03:28:56
问题 I am trying to learn JavaScript but I've come across a hurdle. If the answer is obvious and reachable through a simple search I apologize in advance. I am a novice to programming and JavaScript, and unsure what line of inquiry to follow. In the following code, the function takes values from a HTML form, does some processing and sends them back. I've tested the input and output process and it's working correctly. function foo() { var x = parseInt(document.formdata.fieldone.value); var y =

How to use anonymous functions for mutate_each (and summarise_each)? [duplicate]

允我心安 提交于 2019-12-07 02:27:12
问题 This question already has an answer here : Using anonymous functions with summarize_each or mutate_each (1 answer) Closed last year . As we know, it is possible to call functions in R without assigning them to the environment, e.g. > (function(x){x/2})(5) [1] 2.5 I would like to use functions like these, on the fly, in a mutate_each (or summarise_each ) call. For example, with df <- data.frame(a = runif(10), b = rnorm(10)) I might attempt to do one of the following, but they all return errors

using for/while loops in anonymous functions in Matlab

霸气de小男生 提交于 2019-12-07 01:27:35
问题 I have found anonymous function pretty useful, but a lot of times I'll need to use a loop in order to make the function work. For example: while val<tolerance ..... end I am aware that I can save the function in a separate file, and that sometimes I can vectorize the code and then the anonymous function can work, but in some cases it is very hard to find an alternative to a for loop. Matlab documentation doesn't discuss it or say it is impossible. Any ideas? 回答1: The Functional Programming

PHP anonymous function variable as reference

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-06 16:20:28
While working with Laravel framework, more specific - Form macros, I stumbled upon a weird error. At first, I thought it's something wrong with Laravel, but then I took everything out of context: <?php // placeholder function that takes variable as reference $function = function(&$reference) { // append to variable $reference = $reference . ':' . __METHOD__; }; // test with straight call $variable = 'something'; $function($variable); echo $variable; // test with call_user_func(), that gets called in Laravels case $variable = 'something'; // reset call_user_func($function, $variable); echo

Passing additional iteration-dependent inputs to ode45

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-06 15:47:20
I'm trying to solve differential equation using the ode45 function. Consider the following code, [t1,X2] = ode45(@(t,x)fun(t,x,C1,C2,C3,C4),t0,X01); where parameters C1 , C2 , C3 and C4 are column vectors, which should be available to the function that ode45 is referring to ( fun.m ). I want the values to change after every iteration, so for example, at the beginning the entry of C1 I want in is C1(1) , in the next iteration it's C1(2) , etc. How can I implement that? You may have noticed that the official docs are not too helpful in this scenario (as they pretty much force you to use global

trouble when using anonymous functions inside erlang modules

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-12-06 11:32:21
i was working with anonymous functionss in erlang when a problem caught my attention. the function is defined as follows -module(qt). -export([ra/0]). ra = fun() -> 4 end. this however does not work -export(Ra/0]). Ra = fun() -> 4 end. and neither does this can anyone tell me why erlang exhibits this behaviour ? An Erlang module cannot export variables, only functions. You can achieve something similar to exporting variables by exporting a function with zero arguments that simply returns a value (an anonymous function is a valid return value): -module(qt). -export([ra/0]). ra() -> fun() -> 4

Replacing anonymous functions with named function (in jQuery)

戏子无情 提交于 2019-12-06 10:23:47
问题 My original (working) code looks like: jQuery().ready(function ($) { $('[id="errorMessages"]').ajaxStart(function () { $(this).html(""); }); $('[id="errorMessages"]').ajaxError(function (e, jqxhr, settings, exception) { //... }); }); When I am trying to replace the anonymous functions into a named function calls like: (I am doing a POC for some requirement, which expects such implementation.) function fs() { $(this).html(""); } function fe(e, jqxhr, settings, exception) { //... } jQuery()

Scala anonymous function syntax and return type

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-06 08:44:17
问题 I have found few kinds of anonymous function syntax in scala: val m5_1 = { (n: Int) => n * 5 } val m5_2 = (n: Int) => { n * 5 } : Int val m5_3: Int => Int = n => { n * 5 } Is that all types or some more syntax kinds present? Are they all equivalent? Which one is more/less preferred? How can I specify the return type in m5_1 ? 回答1: I'll try to add to @pamu's answer: Which one is more/less preferred? I'd say the second variant is a bit uncommon. When the type inference is easily visible, you

Anonymous function with no curly braces and no argument labels?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-06 08:06:56
I saw some code on another question that seems to create an anonymous function (closure expression) with some unusual syntax: let plus: (Int, Int) -> Int = (+) I understand the left side—that it's declaring a constant of type (Int, Int) -> Int (a function that takes two Integers and returns an Integer). But what is (+) ? How can it declare a function without curly brackets, and how does it refer to the two arguments when there are no argument labels of any kind? The function takes two arguments, adds them together, and returns the result. If I replace the + operator with a different one (say a

Why use (function(){})() or !function(){}()?

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-06 06:44:01
问题 I was reading In JavaScript, what is the advantage of !function(){}() over (function () {})()? then it hit me, why use : (function(){})() or !function(){}() instead of just function(){}() ? Is there any specific reason? 回答1: It depends on where you write this. function(){}() by itself will generate a syntax error as it is evaluated as function declaration and those need names. By using parenthesis or the not operator, you enforce it to be interpreted as function expression , which don't need