abort

How to abort a running program in MATLAB?

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-11-27 13:58:26
Sometimes after calling a function (which takes some 30 odd minutes to finish), you realize that you did something wrong and want to stop the program . How do you do that in MATLAB? What I do is shutdown MATLAB completely and restart . I think there would be a way to abort the execution of the function instead. Anybody know what that is? Hitting Ctrl + C usually does the trick, although sometimes it has been known to run into snags . 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1500314/how-to-abort-a-running-program-in-matlab

C++: How to implement a timeout for an arbitrary function call?

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-27 11:08:22
I need to call a library function that sometimes won't terminate within a given time, unfortunately. Is there a way to call the function but abort it if it doesn't terminate within n seconds? I cannot modify the function, so I cannot put the abort condition into it directly. I have to add a timeout to the function externally . Is it maybe a possible solution to start it as a (boost) thread, which I can then terminate after a certain time? Would something like that work? I actually believe the function is not thread-safe, but that wouldn't matter if I run it as the only single thread, right?

Xcode 8 cocoapods abort trap: 6

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-11-27 11:01:21
问题 localhost:PodTest3 haiwang$ pod install Analyzing dependencies Downloading dependencies Installing MBProgressHUD (0.9.2) Installing Masonry (1.0.2) Generating Pods project Abort trap: 6 After upgrading to Xcode 8, cocoapods doesn't work anymore. I have tried to uninstall and install, but it still doesn't work. 回答1: For me, I solved this issue by uninstalling and then again installing CocoaPods with --pre with the command sudo gem uninstall cocoapods sudo gem install cocoapods --pre Hopefully

Abort trap 6 error in C

烂漫一生 提交于 2019-11-27 09:25:17
I have this code: void drawInitialNim(int num1, int num2, int num3) { int board[2][50]; //make an array with 3 columns int i; // i, j, k are loop counters int j; int k; for(i=0;i<num1+1;i++) //fill the array with rocks, or 'O' board[0][i] = 'O'; //for example, if num1 is 5, fill the first row with 5 rocks for (i=0; i<num2+1; i++) board[1][i] = 'O'; for (i=0; i<num3+1; i++) board[2][i] = 'O'; for (j=0; j<2;j++) { //print the array for (k=0; k<50;k++) { printf("%d",board[j][k]); } } return; } int main() { int numRock1,numRock2,numRock3; numRock1 = 0; numRock2 = 0; numRock3 = 0; printf("Welcome

What is a safe way to stop a running thread?

半腔热情 提交于 2019-11-27 09:06:14
I have a thread which contains execution of an IronPython script. For some reason I may need to stop this thread at any time, including script execution. How to achieve this? The first idea is Thread.Abort() , but it's known to be evil... Tudor Well from you question and subsequent comments I can suggest you two options, with some additional "warnings": If your thread loops executing something on each iteration, you can set a volatile boolean flag such that it exits after finishing the current iteration (pseudocode because I'm not familiar with python): while shouldExit = false // do stuff

Can ThreadAbortException skip finally?

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-11-27 07:07:58
问题 Everything I've read claims an abort on a thread will execute the finally block before ending from a ThreadAbortException. I wanted to confirm this so I can plan on how to handle some 3rd party code that can hang indefinitely. However the following test has me confused: public void runTest(DateTime deadline) { testThread = new Thread(() => { try { Console.WriteLine("test thread started at " + DateTime.Now.ToShortTimeString()); while (true) { } } finally { Console.WriteLine("test thread

Abort call to unmanaged DLL

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-11-27 04:26:20
问题 I have an unmanaged DLL with a function that can run for a long time if the input parameter is a large value, sometimes that is desirable but not always. How can I in c# call this function so that I can abort it when needed? So far I have tried to put the call in a separate thread, but neither interrupt nor abort seem to stop the process, which runs at 100% CPU until the dll is done. Is it possible to terminate the running dll code? 回答1: Unmanaged code is only abortable if it is an "alertable

What is the difference between exit() and abort()?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-11-27 02:35:20
In C and C++, what is the difference between exit() and abort() ? I am trying to end my program after an error (not an exception). abort() exits your program without calling functions registered using atexit() first, and without calling objects' destructors first. exit() does both before exiting your program. It does not call destructors for automatic objects though. So A a; void test() { static A b; A c; exit(0); } Will destruct a and b properly, but will not call destructors of c . abort() wouldn't call destructors of neither objects. As this is unfortunate, the C++ Standard describes an

How to programmatically cause a core dump in C/C++

南楼画角 提交于 2019-11-26 21:24:04
I would like to force a core dump at a specific location in my C++ application. I know I can do it by doing something like: int * crash = NULL; *crash = 1; But I would like to know if there is a cleaner way? I am using Linux by the way. paxdiablo Raising of signal number 6 ( SIGABRT in Linux) is one way to do it (though keep in mind that SIGABRT is not required to be 6 in all POSIX implementations so you may want to use the SIGABRT value itself if this is anything other than quick'n'dirty debug code). #include <signal.h> : : : raise (SIGABRT); Calling abort() will also cause a core dump, and

Browser waits for ajax call to complete even after abort has been called (jQuery)

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-26 17:38:51
问题 I have some (potentially) long-running ajax calls that I would like to abort if the user navigates to another page. The following jQuery code calls abort on all pending XMLHttpRequest objects upon navigating away from the page: $.ajaxSetup({ beforeSend: function(xhr) { $(window).bind('beforeunload', function() { xhr.abort(); }); } }); In a test case, I force a 10-second wait on the server-side operation being called. Using Firebug, I confirmed that the above code does indeed cause all pending